Current:Home > ContactFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -WealthSphere Pro
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
EchoSense View
Date:2025-04-07 20:19:34
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- Kids Face Rising Health Risks from Climate Change, Doctors Warn as Juliana Case Returns to Court
- Global Coal Consumption Likely Has Peaked, Report Says
- Despite its innocently furry appearance, the puss caterpillar's sting is brutal
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- Crazy Rich Asians Star Henry Golding's Wife Liv Lo Is Pregnant, Expecting Baby No. 2
- Bodies of 3 men recovered from Davenport, Iowa, building collapse site, officials say
- Trump Takes Ax to Science and Other Advisory Committees, Sparking Backlash
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- The Barbie movie used so much pink paint it caused a shortage
Ranking
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- Federal Program Sends $15 Million to Help Coal Communities Adapt
- Today’s Climate: June 2, 2010
- With early Alzheimer's in the family, these sisters decided to test for the gene
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- How the Love & Death Costumes Hide the Deep, Dark Secret of the True Crime Story
- Crazy Rich Asians Star Henry Golding's Wife Liv Lo Is Pregnant, Expecting Baby No. 2
- The Summer I Turned Pretty Season 2 Finally Has a Release Date
Recommendation
Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
States Begin to Comply with Clean Power Plan, Even While Planning to Sue
Whatever happened to the Indonesian rehab that didn't insist on abstinence?
How has your state's abortion law affected your life? Share your story
What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
Arctic Report Card: Lowest Sea Ice on Record, 2nd Warmest Year
Robert Hanssen, former FBI agent convicted of spying for Russia, dead at 79
A news anchor showed signs of a stroke on air, but her colleagues caught them early